Teaching Radar
AI, thinking & learning

The same AI tool can erode thinking or build it. Design decides.

A running scan of the research on how AI shapes the way students think and learn, with the classroom move each finding points to. Built for faculty teaching with AI, not around it.

How to read the spectrum: each marker is a selected research finding, placed by whether it erodes or builds thinking. The striking part is that the same technology shows up on both ends. What moves a finding left or right is not the model. It is the design, and how students use it.

Erodes thinking Builds thinking
Habitual, unguarded AI use tracks with weaker critical thinking
Gerlich 2025
Take the unguarded tool away and scores fall below never having it
Bastani 2025 · GPT Base
The more workers trusted AI, the less they thought critically
Lee 2025 · Microsoft + CMU
A tutor with guardrails preserved learning instead of harming it
Bastani 2025 · GPT Tutor
A pedagogically designed AI tutor doubled learning gains
Kestin 2025 · Harvard

Why this exists

The goal is responsible AI in teaching: not banning the tools, not adopting them blindly, but designing courses so AI builds judgment instead of replacing it. This radar turns the evidence into decisions a professor can act on.

Who maintains it

Built by Jedson Pinto, Assistant Professor of Accounting and co-founder of the AI Accounting Lab at UT Dallas, as part of ongoing work on AI in accounting education. jedsonpinto.com